Canceling Meetings a PR Ploy?
I just saw this on the Face2Face blog regarding a recent online survey by Special Events. This paragraph caught my eye:
Why doesn’t this surprise me? What about you – are you seeing things canceled not because you don’t have the money to do it but because it “looks” better to investors and shareholders?
Some 68 percent of respondents to an online poll from Special Events last week say that recent moves by corporations to cancel incentives and other meetings are PR ploys to avoid the “AIG effect.” Twenty-eight percent say the cancellations are a business decision; 2 percent of respondents say they do not know why the events are being canceled.
1 Comment
Leave a comment
Additional comments powered byBackType
About
Favorite Service
Recent Comments
- Going Virtual Isn’t Necessarily the Answer to Replacing Your Physical Events on
- Going Virtual Isn’t Necessarily the Answer to Replacing Your Physical Events on
- Going Virtual Isn’t Necessarily the Answer to Replacing Your Physical Events on
- Going Virtual Isn’t Necessarily the Answer to Replacing Your Physical Events on
- Going Virtual Isn’t Necessarily the Answer to Replacing Your Physical Events on
Ads by Google
Favorite Books
Marketing Blogs
PR Blogs
- KD Paine's Measurement Blog
- Micro Persuasion
Virtual Events & Meetings Blogs
- Cisco Virtual Environments
- It's All Virtual
- The Webinar Blog
- Virtual Edge Institute
Some meetings aren’t being held this year that were held last year even though they were strictly business-related, but these decisions were made last year. I do think that meetings won’t be the only thing that comes under attack. Granted, the AIG example is huge, but I’ve seen it sticking in people’s minds when it comes to internal business planning. As people become more nervous, more fingers are being pointed along with the question, “Should we be doing that in this environment?”. And the fingers are pointed at even the littlest items that are critical to the business.